Azure Security Posture
& CIS Benchmark Review
Strengthen your Azure security baseline. Azure environments become complex quickly - subscriptions grow, permissions expand, resources are exposed, logs are missed, and security settings drift over time. RTCS reviews your Azure posture against practical controls and CIS Benchmark guidance, identifies configuration gaps and provides clear remediation steps.
- Azure security posture assessment
- CIS Microsoft Azure Benchmark gap review
- Microsoft Defender for Cloud review
- Azure Policy and compliance review
- Entra ID, RBAC and privileged access review
- Network security, NSGs and public exposure review
- Storage account, database and Key Vault review
- Logging, diagnostic settings and SIEM integration review
- Risk-rated remediation roadmap with retest support
Azure posture drifts. This is the review that catches it.
Azure security depends on strong identity, secure configuration, controlled access and continuous visibility. RTCS reviews Microsoft Azure environments against practical security controls and CIS Benchmark guidance - so you know where your baseline actually stands and what to fix first.
Where Azure environments usually fail the baseline.
Excessive permissions
Weak privileged access controls
Publicly exposed resources
Storage accounts with risky settings
Missing diagnostic logs
Incomplete Defender for Cloud configuration
Overly permissive network rules
Poor Key Vault access control
Unused or stale identities
Weak policy enforcement
Limited evidence for audits or assurance
A recognised baseline. A practical gap review.
The CIS Microsoft Azure Benchmark provides a recognised baseline for secure Azure configuration. RTCS assesses your environment against CIS-aligned controls and identifies where configuration, governance or evidence gaps exist - then turns it into a clear remediation plan.
Review areas
Configured. Not just enabled.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud can provide useful visibility across posture, recommendations and regulatory compliance. RTCS reviews whether it's configured effectively and producing useful security outcomes - not just generating noise.
Identity, Network & Logging
Identity & Privileged Access
Azure role assignments, privileged administrator roles, PIM configuration, MFA and Conditional Access, guest and external users, service principals, app registrations, managed identities, break-glass accounts and stale access. Pair with Identity & Access Management.
Network & Public Exposure
Public IPs, network security groups, firewall rules, management ports, virtual networks and subnets, private endpoints, application gateways, load balancers, database exposure and storage exposure.
Logging & Monitoring
Azure Activity Logs, Entra ID sign-in logs, diagnostic settings, network logs, storage access, Key Vault logs, Defender alerts, SIEM integration and log retention.
Storage, Secrets & Workloads
Storage account exposure and encryption, database security, Key Vault access policies and secrets handling, VM exposure and configuration, App Service settings and managed workloads.
For SIEM-side review of the logs this assessment confirms are flowing, see Detection & Response Readiness.
Posture vs Pentest
Posture & CIS Review
Focuses on configuration, controls and compliance alignment. Identifies broad control gaps, evidence weaknesses and CIS Benchmark misalignment across the whole environment.
Penetration Testing
Focuses on validating attack paths and exploitability. Proves what an attacker could do with the configuration you have - see Penetration Testing.
Scope to Support
A practical, staged engagement that produces an Azure baseline you can actually act on.
Confirm the subscriptions, tenants, resource groups, workloads and benchmark requirements.
Review configuration, identity, networking, storage, logging, Defender for Cloud and CIS Benchmark alignment.
Confirm findings, remove noise and assess practical risk.
Rank issues based on exposure, impact and remediation effort.
Provide clear findings, evidence and remediation guidance.
Where required, support remediation planning, retesting and evidence preparation.
Who It's For & What You Receive
Who This Service Is For
- Use Microsoft Azure
- Need to assess Azure security posture
- Need CIS Benchmark alignment
- Need evidence for audit or assurance
- Need to improve Defender for Cloud
- Need to reduce public exposure
- Need to review Azure permissions
- Need a practical remediation roadmap
- Want clearer reporting on Azure security risk
Typical Deliverables
- Azure security posture report
- CIS Benchmark gap assessment
- Defender for Cloud review
- Azure Policy & compliance findings
- Identity & privileged access findings
- Public exposure findings
- Logging & monitoring gaps
- Risk-rated recommendations
- Remediation roadmap
- Executive summary
- Retest results where included
Where Azure posture connects to the rest of the program.
Cloud Security →
Broader cloud security review across Azure, AWS, GCP, M365 and Entra ID environments.
Identity & Access Management →
Entra ID, RBAC, privileged access and Conditional Access deep-dive across the same tenant.
Penetration Testing →
Offensive validation of Azure attack paths the posture review identifies as risky.
Detection & Response →
SIEM-side use of the Azure logs this review confirms are enabled and flowing.
Vulnerability Management →
Operational program to track and close the remediation actions from the review.
IT Project Implementation →
Delivery support to implement the configuration changes and harden the environment.
Governance, Risk & Compliance →
Evidence, audit alignment and control mapping for ISO 27001, Essential Eight and IRAP.
Disaster Recovery & Backups →
Recovery, backup and resilience review for the Azure workloads in scope.
Azure security needs clear configuration, strong identity controls and regular review. Talk to us about an Azure security posture review, CIS Benchmark assessment, Defender for Cloud review or Azure remediation roadmap.
Common Questions
What is an Azure security posture review?
An Azure security posture review assesses how securely your Azure environment is configured across identity, networking, storage, logging, workloads and governance.
What is the CIS Microsoft Azure Benchmark?
The CIS Microsoft Azure Benchmark is a secure configuration baseline for Microsoft Azure. It provides guidance that can be used to assess and improve Azure security settings.
Do you use Microsoft Defender for Cloud?
Yes. RTCS can review Defender for Cloud configuration, secure score, recommendations, alerts and regulatory compliance reporting.
Can you help remediate findings?
Yes. RTCS can provide remediation guidance and support your team with prioritised actions, retesting and evidence preparation.
Is this the same as a penetration test?
No. An Azure posture and CIS Benchmark review focuses on configuration, controls and compliance alignment. A penetration test focuses on validating attack paths and exploitability.
Can this help with audit readiness?
Yes. The review can help identify evidence gaps, control weaknesses and remediation actions before an audit or customer assurance review.
Available across Australia.
RTCS provides Microsoft 365 and cloud security reviews for Australian businesses, including Azure, Entra ID and CIS Benchmark review. See cyber security services across Australia for location-specific guidance.
Not sure what you need?
Use the enquiry form or email [email protected] with a brief summary. Include your organisation, the service area if known, and any timing requirements.